Customization of SIRS Forms
Schools
Schools have the ability to customize their SIRS form as long as Questions 9 and 10 (the overall course quality and teaching effectiveness questions) are retained. Please contact our office at otear@rutgers.edu or by phone at (848)-932-7466 to discuss and make arrangements.
Departments
Departments can add questions to the standard SIRS form. These questions will then be automatically loaded into the prearranged course surveys. In DIG you will see a field called Survey Form (circled in the picture below) which denotes what additional questions will be added to the standard SIRS questions.
If your department would like to add questions please contact our office at otear@rutgers.edu or by phone (848)-932-7466 to discuss and make arrangements. Questions will need to be received about one month after the start of a semester to be added to course surveys for that semester.
Questions added by contacting OTEAR will be included on the survey in future semesters. For last-minute questions or short-term use, administrators and Instructors also have the option of adding their own questions before the survey is sent to the students. They may choose from an existing optional question bank, or enter questions of their own wording. Questions added through this method will not automatically carry forward to future semesters.
Below is a list of the departmental survey forms in the Blue system. Click on the name of a form to see the questions. In some of the questions you will see “[C$FN] [C$LN]” – this is a piping code that will place the instructor’s name into the question. If there are two or more instructors the question will repeat with each instructor’s name inserted.
The standard SIRS questions are included on department surveys, with the exception of the “Guest Lecturer (short form)” which replaces the standard SIRS. All other departmental forms listed below are questions in addition to the standard SIRS.
More information about adding School or Department questions and a variety of different questions is available in Canvas (login to continue to the correct page), or by contacting otear@rutgers.edu.
*Standard SIRS
– The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner.
– The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions.
– The instructor generated interest in the course material.
– The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material.
– The instructor assigned grades fairly.
– The instructional methods encouraged student learning.
– I learned a great deal in this course.
– I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course.
– I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as:
– I rate the overall quality of the course as:
– What do you like best about this course?
– If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?
– In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?
– Other comments or suggestions:
Departmental Questions: SIRS Forms Listing
Army ROTC
– What feedback and recommendations do you have concerning Fall’s Field Training Exercise?
– What feedback and recommendations do you have concerning morning physical training?
– What feedback and recommendations do you have concerning Friday’s lab?
– What feedback and recommendations do you have concerning recruitment and retention in the Rutgers ROTC program? What recommendations do you have?
Byrne Seminars
– I actively contributed to our class discussions
– Enrichment activities (i.e. field trips, meals, guest speakers, etc.) were valuable (if applicable)
– The activities in class helped us develop relationships with our peers
– Byrne Seminars helped me to see myself as part of the larger Rutgers community
– I now have a basic understanding of what scholarly inquiry or primary research is
– I may choose to participate in a faculty member’s research while at Rutgers
– I have a better sense of the academic and/or research opportunities Rutgers offers me
– I realize I can approach this professor and/or other professors to discuss ideas and plans
– I would recommend to other Rutgers students that they take a Byrne Seminar
Chemical Biology
– In this course I learned to draw conclusions, hypothesize, consider alternatives or decide a course of action
– In this course I learned to evaluate conclusions and solutions based on appropriate criteria and to revise as necessary
– In this course I learned to provide support for arguments, solutions, and results
– In this course I learned the habits, attitudes and values of critical thinking
– Recitation sections helped me reinforce the content learned in lecture classes
– (For course 158:315) Because of this course I appreciate the role of pharmacists in advancing medical sciences in such fields as stem cells and recombinant DNA applications
– (For course 158:315) Through this course I learned modern technological advances in drug development and delivery
– (For course 158:420) In this course I learned the relevance of immunization in the community
– (For course 158:420) In this course I learned to evaluate the relationships between infectious agents and drug treatments
Civil Engineering
– An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics
– An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors
– An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences
– An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts
– An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives
– An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions
– An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies
Douglass Global Village
– This course motivated me to learn more about women and global issues.
– This course helped me make connections between the women and global issues and my major or area of study.
– This course exposed me to diverse perspectives about the world
– This course helped me foster a sense of community with my peers
– Given the opportunity, I would take this course again
– Given the opportunity, I would recommend this course to a friend.
Electrical and Computer Engineering
– I was satisfied with the degree of utilization and the quality of the course web site in this course
– The computer resources were adequate and sufficiently available for the needs of this course
– If a lab course: the necessary equipment to do the work assigned were adequate and sufficiently available
– If a lab course: the experiments were relevant and the laboratory manual was helpful
– If software was used: I was well prepared to complete the assignments using the required software
– Rate the relative difficulty of this course compared with other engineering courses of similar level
– If a design course: rate the percentage of the content of this course occupied by the design component
– If the course had prerequisites: rate the degree of preparation these prerequisites gave you for this course
– Indicate the degree of your satisfaction with the MODE of presentation of the material (e.g., traditional chalk-and-blackboard, Powerpoint, etc.)
FAS-C Philosophy and Religion
– I learned to think more critically
– I learned to read and interpret complex and significant texts
– I learned to write more clearly and effectively
– I learned how to make convincing arguments
– I learned oral communication skills
FAS-C Psychology
– The content of this course incorporated diverse cultural, ethnic, and gender perspectives and/or histories.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was respectful of all students regardless of their race, gender, age, etc.
Guest Lecturer (Short Form)
– The instructor generated interest in the course material. (agree/disagree scale)
– I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: (poor/excellent scale)
– In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress? (open-ended)
(Note: unlike the other questions listed here, the Guest Lecturer (short form) replaces the standard SIRS questions rather than being appended to the SIRS.)
GSAPP Clinical
– Lectures/seminars covered material at an appropriate intellectual level. (If too complicated or too simple, detail in comments.)
– Lectures/seminars stimulated intellectual curiosity.
– Readings were the right level of difficulty. (Note in comments if too complicated or too simple.)
– Course dealt appropriately with role of group differences, e.g., gender, ethnicity, race, religious or sexual orientations as these variables pertain to the subject matter. (Leave blank if this does not fit within scope of subject.)
– Course contributed to your capacity for critical evaluation of subject matter.
– Course maintained or increased your interest in the field.
– Rate the workload of this course.
– Rate the readings.
– Our training program is organized to allow students to experience a progressive series of courses and clinical experiences, in which experiences build on one another, and, over time, require increasing versatility and skill to respond to more complex demands. Please rate how well this course helped you build on prior work and prepare for more advanced and demanding work.
– Our training program is organized to promote integration of clinical training in practica with other elements of the program, such as classroom instruction. Please rate how well this course promoted this sort of integration.
– Instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encouraged student participation in class by questions and discussions.
GSAPP Foundations
– Lectures/seminars covered material at an appropriate intellectual level. (If too complicated or too simple, detail in comments.)
– Lectures/seminars stimulated intellectual curiosity.
– Readings were the right level of difficulty. (Note in comments if too complicated or too simple.)
– Course dealt appropriately with role of group differences, e.g., gender, ethnicity, race, religious or sexual orientations as these variables pertain to the subject matter. (Leave blank if this does not fit within scope of subject.)
– Course contributed to your capacity for critical evaluation of subject matter.
– Course maintained or increased your interest in the field.
– Rate the workload of this course.
– Rate the readings.
– Our training program is organized to allow students to experience a progressive series of courses and clinical experiences, in which experiences build on one another, and, over time, require increasing versatility and skill to respond to more complex demands. Please rate how well this course provided you with a foundation you can build on in your clinical practice and more advanced courses.
– Our training program is organized to promote integration of clinical training in practica with other elements of the program, such as classroom instruction. Please rate how well this course promoted this sort of integration.
– Instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encouraged student participation in class by questions and discussions.
GSAPP
– Lectures/seminars covered material at an appropriate intellectual level
– Lectures/seminars stimulated intellectual curiosity
– Readings were the right level of difficulty
– Course dealt appropriately with role of group differences e.g., gender, ethnicity, race, religious or sexual orientations as these variables pertain to the subject matter. (Leave blank if this does not fit within scope of subject.)
– Course contributed to your capacity for critical evaluation of subject matter
– Course maintained or increased your interest in the field
– Rate the workload of this course
– Rate the readings
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encouraged student participation in class by questions and discussions
Honors College
– Answer the following with respect to the Honors College Mission Course – The Forum:
– I know very little about interdisciplinarity
– The Honors College mission course is relevant to everyday life.
– It is important for me to learn what is being taught in the Honors College mission course.
– Today’s problems will need Social innovations to solve them.
– I do not know anything about social innovations.
– I typically like to think of social innovation.
– Please rate your overall effectiveness for the following:
– Able to effectively communicate orally
– Apply critical thinking/ analytical reasoning to complex issues
– Apply ethical judgment and decision making
– Able to work effectively in teams
– Able to work independently
– Able to prioritize and manage time
– Being self-motivated
– Being proactive and offer ideas and solutions
– Able to communicate effectively in writing
– Able to apply knowledge/skills to real world settings
– Evaluate the following:
– I plan to do some volunteer work.
– I plan to become involved in my community.
– I plan to participate in a community action program.
– I plan to become an active member of my community.
– In the future, I plan to participate in a community service organization.
– I plan to help others who are in difficulty.
– I am committed to making a positive difference.
Law
– The amount of work required was:
– The professor [C$FN] [C$LN] was readily available outside the classroom
– The professor [C$FN] [C$LN] examined the implications of the subject matter for a practicing attorney
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) choice of course content
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) integration of current developments into the course material
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) choice of casebook, texts, and other assigned readings
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) emphasis on professional responsibility
– The instructor ([C$FN] [C$LN]) created a respectful and welcoming classroom environment that encouraged and supported the expression of diverse points of view.
– The course content incorporated critical perspectives on the law including discussions of race.
Law – Teaching Fellows
– How many Teaching Fellow review sessions did you attend?
– The Teaching Fellow’s teaching methods and styles supported my learning in the course.
– The Teaching Fellow was sufficiently prepared for all classes
– Please provide any additional comments that you feel will assist us in improving the Teaching Fellow program.
– If you would like to elaborate on your answers to the previous questions, please do so here:
– The amount of work required was:
– The course content incorporated critical perspectives on the law including discussions of race.
– The professor [C$FN] [C$LN] was readily available outside the classroom
– The professor [C$FN] [C$LN] examined the implications of the subject matter for a practicing attorney
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) choice of course content
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) integration of current developments into the course material
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) choice of casebook, texts, and other assigned readings
– Please rate the Professor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) emphasis on professional responsibility
– The instructor ([C$FN] [C$LN]) created a respectful and welcoming classroom environment that encouraged and supported the expression of diverse points of view.
MGSA Music – Form 1 – Lectures/Seminars
– There is an appropriate balance between theoretical concepts and concrete example or illustrations
– Reading and/or listening assignments are relevant
– Class time does not merely duplicate assigned readings
– Written assignments, quizzes and exams are appropriately designed and instructive
– Assignments and exams are returned promptly
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helps me establish a positive rapport with the class
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encourages independent thought and individual questions
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] communicates both interest and knowledge in area of study
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] is available to students outside of class
MGSA Music – Form 2 – Large Ensembles
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] selects appropriately challenging repertoire
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] uses rehearsal time efficiently
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] is able to diagnose and correct performance problems
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] communicates instructions and interpretive ideas clearly
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] promotes a sense of cohesion as an ensemble
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] demonstrates technical understanding of voices or instruments in the ensemble
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] demonstrates thorough knowledge of the music being performed
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] demonstrates clear conducting technique
– The director/coach [C$FN] [C$LN] treats rehearsal as a learning experience as well as preparation for public performance
MGSA Music – Form 3 – Private Lessons
– Generally, an appropriate balance of technical and artistic training is present in lessons
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helps me establish good practice/work habits
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] is able to diagnose and correct technical and artistic problems
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] provides the full measure of lesson time over the semester
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] challenges me to learn and perform at an appropriate level for my ability
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] has high standards of performance for the student
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] is encouraging, gives constructive criticism, and achieves results without using sarcasm or ridicule
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] stimulates artistic growth, independent thinking, and self-reliance
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] gives freely of his/her time outside of lessons while maintaining a professional/personal balance with the student
MGSA Music – Form 4
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helps me focus ideas towards the goal of the study project
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helps me develop good work habits
– The instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) ideas do not supersede the student’s
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encourages independent thought and self-reliance
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] provides appropriate balance between practical and theoretical assistance
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treats me as an individual, and shows awareness of my strengths and weaknesses
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] offers constructive criticism, is neither patronizing nor sarcastic
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] keeps appointments and reschedules those he/she misses
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] gives full attention during meeting times
MGSA Visual Arts
– The content of this course included diverse cultural, ethnic, and gender perspectives and/or histories. Comment below.
– This course has increased my ability to think and act creatively in this discipline
– This course was intellectually and creatively stimulating
– My techniques of observation and inquiry in this field improved as a result of this course
– Readings and/or gallery visits were useful as a supplementary resource
– The instructor ([C$FN] [C$LN]) supported an inclusive and respectful learning environment. Comment below.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] answered questions and facilitated participation in group discussions
Rutgers Business School
– Since the beginning of this course how many hours a week, on average, have you spent on this course in addition to class time?
– If you sought the instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) assistance outside of class, the instructor was helpful. (leave blank if not applicable)
– The instructor ([C$FN] [C$LN]) treated students in this course with respect
– The instructor ([C$FN] [C$LN]) strived to create an environment that promoted academic integrity
SAS Cell Bio and Neuroscience
– This course or course section has helped you to understand the mechanisms underlying biological processes.
– This course or course section has taught you to summarize and interpret scientific/clinical data.
– This course or course section has provided insight into how current and novel problems in cell biology & neuroscience are being solved.
SAS Criminal Justice
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] created a respectful and welcoming classroom environment that encouraged and supported the expression of diverse points of view.
– The course incorporated appropriately diverse perspectives, group differences, and/or histories regarding the subject matter.
– This course dealt appropriately with the nature of inequities with respect to such dimensions as gender, ethnicity, race, religion, or sexual orientation as pertaining to the subject matter.
– In what ways did the course and instructor create an inclusive and welcoming class and what, if anything, could have been done to make you feel more welcome and included in the class?
– How could this class better address issues of inequality and/or inequity as it relates to the subject matter?
SAS English
– My literary background prepared me for this course
– My preparation for each class was
– My attendance record for this course was
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] commented carefully and usefully on my papers
– I sought extra help from my instructor [C$FN] [C$LN]
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was helpful during office hours
SAS EOF
– This course helped me feel more prepared for my first semester of college
– This course helped me acquire new skills
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was accessible and responsive
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] used available class time productively
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] returned graded materials in time for me to use them as a study guides
SAS European Studies
– Course assignments (e.g. quizzes, tests, essay topics, or midterm exams) accurately reflected material taught.
– My experience in this course has encouraged me to continue taking courses in this subject.
SAS FIGS Peer Instruction
– This course aided me in conducting my FIGS this semester.
– I found the text for this class to be useful
– I enjoyed the format of this course (discussion, information sharing, activities, minimal lecture, etc.)
– I successfully integrated the mandatory FIGS elements into my course
– I successfully introduced my students to the discipline/topic of my FIGS
– I feel that my FIGS class has aided students in the adjustment to their first semester at Rutgers
– Teaching a FIGS class aided me in improving my public speaking and communication skills
– Teaching a FIGS class aided me in improving my time management and planning skills
– If I had to make the decision again, I would still teach a FIGS this semester
SAS German
– Course quizzes, tests and other assignments accurately reflected material taught
– I had a strong prior interest in studying German beyond this course level
– My experience in this class has encouraged me to continue taking German courses
– Assignments were graded and returned promptly
SAS Philosophy
– This course helped me learn how to critically evaluate ideas and arguments.
– This course helped me learn how to present views that differ from my own in an accurate and fair way.
– This course helped me learn how to write clearly.
– Since the beginning of this course how many hours a week, on average, have you spent on this course in addition to class time?
– What letter grade do you expect in the course?
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treated students in this course with respect.
SAS Physics Advanced Lectures
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The homework assignments aided my understanding of the subject
– Homework solutions were helpful and made available quickly
– Rate the pace of the course
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was articulate and spoke English clearly
SAS Physics Introductory Lectures
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The homework assignments aided my understanding of the subject
– Homework solutions were helpful and made available quickly
– Lecture demonstrations using equipment aided my understanding of the subject
– Rate the pace of the course
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was articulate and spoke English clearly
SAS Physics Laboratories
– The lab experiments were instructive
– The lab equipment was usually functioning
– The lab manual was clear
– I had to spend too much time preparing for the lab
– Rate the difficulty of the experiments
– Rate the usefulness of the feedback provided by the graded lab reports
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was articulate and spoke English clearly
SAS Physics Recitations
– I rate the overall quality of the recitation as:
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was articulate and spoke English clearly
SAS Physics Workshops
– The mini-labs were a worthwhile component of the course
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was articulate and spoke English clearly
SAS Physics Advanced Lectures and Laboratories
(see separate “Advanced Lectures” and “Laboratories” above. This form will automatically adjust the questions based on mode of instruction)
SAS Physics Advanced Lectures and Recitations
(see separate “Advanced Lectures” and “Recitations” above. This form will automatically adjust the questions based on mode of instruction
SAS Physics Introductory Lectures and Laboratories
(see separate “Introductory Lectures” and “Laboratories” above. This form will automatically adjust the questions based on mode of instruction)
SAS Physics Introductory Lectures and Recitations
(see separate “Introductory Lectures” and “Recitations” above. This form will automatically adjust the questions based on mode of instruction)
SAS Physics Introductory Lectures and Workshops
(see separate “Introductory Lectures” and “Workshops” above. This form will automatically adjust the questions based on mode of instruction)
SAS Signature Course
– I would recommend this course to other students
SAS Sociology 101
– In this course, I learned how human social differences shape a person’s life.
– In this course, I received a good introduction to the process and techniques of social research.
– In this course, I learned different sociological theories to explain social differences.
– In this course, I learned different sociological concepts to apply to social issues such as racial conflict, poverty, disease, and gender discrimination.
SAS Sociology 103
– In this course, I learned how social problems are affected by large-scale financial, political, and social processes.
– In this course, I learned why some issues are considered social problems and others are not.
– In this course, I learned about ethical issues related to social problems.
– In this course, I learned different sociological concepts to apply to social issues such as racial conflict, poverty, disease, and gender discrimination.
SAS Sociology 108
– In this course, I learned how minority populations are changing in the US.
– In this course, I studied interaction between and within majority and minority groups.
– In this course, I learned about discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and gender.
– In this course, I learned about how minorities’ racialized, ethnic, immigrant, and/or gender status affect their life chances or experiences.
SAS Sociology 205
– In this course, I learned how the media reflect social processes in our society.
– In this course, I learned about ethical issues in the media such as the role of privacy.
– In this course, I learned about some specific examples of how media shape our perceptions of social reality.
SAS Sociology 210
– In this course, I learned how the diagnosis and treatment of disease are social processes.
– In this course, I learned how social factors affect how health care is distributed to people.
– In this course, I learned about specific groups in the population who suffer from varying levels of illness and mortality.
SAS Sociology 222
– In this course, I learned about social factors that support and reward criminal behavior.
– In this course, I learned how different races and ethnicities are treated differently in the criminal justice system.
– In this course, I learned about how social factors shape the definition of criminal behavior.
SAS Sociology 240
– In this course, I learned that normality and abnormality, as ideas for expressing social differences, are partly socially constructed and partly biologically grounded.
– In this course, I was introduced to different disciplinary perspectives (e.g., sociological, psychological, biological, historical) for understanding how human behavior comes to be seen as normal or not.
– In this course, I was taught to think critically about our assumptions about normal behavior, and I was introduced to the use of evidence in support of that critical thinking.
– In this course, I learned how the idea of normality is applied across a variety of social settings.
– In this course, I learned how to express my ideas in writing in a way comparable to how social scientists present their arguments.
– In this course, I was required to assess source material properly and use the conventions of attribution and citation correctly.
– In this course, I was required to analyze and synthesize information from different sources and express my ideas in writing.
– I would recommend this course to other students.
SAS Sociology 311
– In this course, I learned how conclusions about social phenomena are drawn from data, including quantitative data, using different types of research strategies.
SAS Sociology 312
– In this course, I learned how conclusions about social phenomena are drawn from quantitative data.
– In this course, I learned how to use statistics to analyze data.
– In this course, I learned techniques for using computer software to analyze data.
SAS Spanish and Portuguese
– My language skills have improved as a result of this course
– My grammar and writing skills have improved as a result of this course
– My linguistic skills have improved as a result of this course
– Improvement in textual analysis & knowledge of target culture has been
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] provided a clear, detailed syllabus for the course
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] demonstrated a knowledge of the subject matter
SAS Writing Program
– The assignments for this course explained the reading and writing tasks in a helpful way
– The group work in the course improved my performance
– How would you rate the difficulty of the assignments?
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] explained objectives and requirements of the course clearly
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] returned written work promptly and made helpful written comments on papers
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was respectful of all students regardless of their race, gender, age, etc
– How would you rate instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) ability and willingness to help students outside of class?
– How would you rate your instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) enthusiasm for the subject of the course?
– How would you rate the instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) ability to involve all students in classroom discussions?
SAS-N Art History Lecture
– This course helped me develop skills that I can use to begin to understand unfamiliar works when I encounter them in the future.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helped me develop an increased understanding of the stylistic, cultural and historical contexts of the material covered in this course.
SAS-N Art History Core Req
– This course helped me develop skills that I can use to begin to understand unfamiliar works when I encounter them in the future.
– I took this course because it was required for my major.
– I took this course because it was required for my college core requirements.
– I took this course because I was specifically interested in the subject matter.
– I took this course mostly because it fit my schedule.
– I feel this course expanded my educational experience.
– I learned skills in this course that I feel I can apply beyond Art History.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] helped me develop an increased understanding of the stylistic, cultural and historical contexts of the material covered in this course.
– Questions for Core Arts and Media Courses
SAS-N Computer Science
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The homework assignments aided my understanding of the subject
– The homework assignments were of an appropriate level of difficulty
– There was a sufficient amount of hands-on experience in a computer lab setting
– The course would be more effective with the aid of a large screen in the classroom
– The class regularly began and ended on time
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] spoke English clearly
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was available outside of class
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treated students with respect
SAS-N Economics
– Is this course required?
– What grade do you expect to receive in this class?
– How many other Economics courses have you taken prior to this semester?
– What was your GPA for previous Economics courses?
SAS-N Geological Sciences
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The lab experiments were instructive
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] returned written work promptly and made helpful comments on the papers
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treated students in the course with respect
– How would you rate instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) availability and willingness to help students outside of class?
– How would you rate your instructor’s ([C$FN] [C$LN]) enthusiasm for the subject of the course?
– Compared to other instructors I have had, I would rate this instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] as
SAS-N Mathematics
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The homework assignments aided my understanding of the subject
– The homework assignments were of an appropriate level of difficulty
– My previous math classes prepared me well for this course
– Technology was used appropriately in this course
– For courses using WebAssign, on-line material was helpful
– The class regularly began and ended on time
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] spoke English clearly
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was available outside of class
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treated the students with respect
SAS-N Math ALEKS
– The textbook was helpful and appropriate
– The homework assignments aided my understanding of the subject
– The homework assignments were of an appropriate level of difficulty
– My previous math classes prepared me well for this course
– Technology was used appropriately in this course
– For courses using WebAssign, on-line material was helpful
– The class regularly began and ended on time
– The explanations provided by ALEKS were helpful in learning the required Math concepts.
– Having an instructor in my ALEKS-based course substantially benefited my learning.
– Using ALEKS enabled me to accomplish more work outside of the classroom than I would have been able to accomplish if this had been a traditional lecture-style course.
– The increased independence in working and learning (enabled by using ALEKS) benefited my progress in the course.
– Overall ALEKS was helpful in learning the Math concepts in this course.
– In the future, if given the choice between an ALEKS-based Math course versus a traditional lecture-style Math course, I would choose the ALEKS-based Math course.
– If you could change any anything regarding the use of ALEKS in this course, what would it/they be?
– Any other comments regarding the use of ALEKS in this course.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] spoke English clearly
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was available outside of class
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] treated the students with respect
SAS-N Writing Program
– This course is based on academic reading. Please comment, as specifically as possible, on whether and how this course has helped to develop your critical reading skills.
– This course, which includes instruction in the writing process, is meant to develop and to strengthen your ability to write analytical essays. Please comment, as specifically as possible, on whether and how the course has helped you in this regard.
– We know that the best writing takes time, but the Writing Program also stresses writing under time limitations. How has the course helped you to develop the ability to write analytical essays in timed situations, such as exams and in-class writing assignments?
-This course is meant to improve your technical writing skills, including attention to grammar, sentence structure, and word choice, as well as quotation, paraphrase, summary, and citation. Please comment on whether and how the course has helped refine your control of language.
School of Business Camden
– What I like about this instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] is…
SCI – Public Speaking
– Overall, I have a better understanding of the techniques involved in audience analysis, speech preparation, and delivery of public presentations as a result of taking this course.
– I found the mediated component of the course (interview assignment, mediated speeches) to be useful for my future career
– I found the main textbook used in the course useful and effective in terms of meeting the learning objectives of the course.
– What letter grade do you expect in the course?
– Overall, I have a better understanding of the theory that explains public speaking techniques and outcomes achieved by speakers as a result of taking this course.
SMLR Labor Studies
– The average time spent studying outside of class each week was in hours
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] successfully encouraged students to take part in discussions
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encouraged students to share their personal experiences in class
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] encouraged students to express disagreement with the instructor’s position or comments
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] cares whether or not the students learn
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was respectful of all students regardless of their race, gender, age, etc
School of Public Affairs
– As a result of taking this course, I am better able to identify and address key public values such as equity, accountability, effectiveness, and efficiency in my work.
– As a result of taking this course, I am better able to identify and incorporate the perspectives of key stakeholder groups, with an eye toward inclusiveness.
– As a result of taking this course I am better able to identify appropriate study designs and data collection methods for a stated problem.
– As a result of taking this course, I am better able to recognize the ethical implications and responsibilities of research and analysis.
– As a result of taking this course I am better able to identify appropriate study designs and data collection methods for a stated problem.
– As a result of taking this course, I am better able to identify, interpret, and discuss relationships, results, and the practical implications of analysis from a public service perspective.
SCJ – Online
– Course content and materials (e.g., online videos, podcasts, lectures) were visually appealing.
– There were sufficient opportunities for participating in interactive learning (e.g., asking questions, sharing ideas synchronously or asynchronously)
– The course provided sufficient opportunities to interact virtually with other students (synchronously or asynchronously)
– I have access to a well-functioning computer to support my work in online courses.
– I have access to a stable and strong internet connection to support my work in online courses.
– I have access to study spaces that allow me to complete my work for online courses.
– The course provided more flexibility in the timing and pace of work than would have been possible in an in-person course.
– I would like to see the School of Criminal Justice offer more courses in an online format.
SPH
– Course objectives were clearly identified at the very beginning of the course.
– Course instruction, content and materials were clearly related to course objectives.
– Course assignments were clearly related to course objectives.
– Assessment of student learning/performance was clearly related to course objectives.
– Student assessment criteria were clear, consistent and fair.
– Guest speakers were knowledgable and communicated effectively.
– The course included the equipment, technology, and other facilties/supplies necessary for meeting the course objectives.
– I rate the overall quality of the course as:
– How many in-class sessions did you miss during the semester?
– Based on your performance on course assessments, what grade do you think you have earned in this course?
– Other comments or suggestions about instructor [C$FN] [C$LN]:
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] provided timely feedback from assessment of performance and progress.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] generated interest in the topic and course materials.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was prepared for class and presented material in an organized manner.
– The instuctor [C$FN] [C$LN] had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] and course materials fostered integration of course concepts with other public health topics.
– I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] as:
– Please rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.
– Please rate the extent to which the course increased your ability in the following areas:
SPH Online
– Course objectives were clearly identified at the very beginning of the course.
– Course instruction, content and materials were clearly related to course objectives.
– Course assignments were clearly related to course objectives.
– Assessment of student learning/performance was clearly related to course objectives.
– Student assessment criteria were clear, consistent and fair.
– Guest speakers were knowledgable and communicated effectively.
– The course included the equipment, technology, and other facilties/supplies necessary for meeting the course objectives.
– I rate the overall quality of the course as:
– Based on your performance on course assessments, what grade do you think you have earned in this course?
– The pace at which material was covered in this course was:
– How helpful were the module self-assessments as preparation for the module graded assessments?
– How helpful were the homework assignments as preparation for the module graded assessments?
– How much time (on average) did you spend on this online course each week (including assigned readings and videos, participating in discussions, completing homework and preparing for and taking assessments)?
– Was the amount of time you spent on this online course each week:
– Overall, how useful did you find the discussion boards in helping you learn the key concepts taught in the course?
– How would you rate the ease of navigation of the Canvas course platform used in this course?
– Rate the quality of the multimedia (audio, video, and animation) used in the course?
– Based on this experience, how likely would you be to take another online course at the Rutgers School of Public Health?
– Other comments or suggestions about instructor [C$FN] [C$LN]:
– If you answered “strongly disagree” or “disagree” to any of the above, please explain.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] provided timely feedback from assessment of performance and progress.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] generated interest in the topic and course materials.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] was prepared for class and presented material in an organized manner.
– The instuctor [C$FN] [C$LN] had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] and course materials fostered integration of course concepts with other public health topics.
– I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] as:
– Please rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.
– Please rate the extent to which the course increased your ability in the following areas:
SSW Intensive Weekend
– Please share experiences in field or on the job that you feel demonstrate new approaches, perspectives, or knowledge that you have acquired in this course. How have you changed as a result of this course and/or field experiences? How has what you learned in the course affected your thinking and practice?
– The course met the objectives in the syllabus.
– Given the subject of the course, there was a good balance between readings, online discussions, and assignments.
– I spent about ____ hours per week on this course.
– The course is relevant to my career in social work.
– I have been able to apply what I have learned in this class in my field placement.
– I have been able to apply what I have learned in this class on the job.
– The instructional methods used by the instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] during intensive weekend classes encourages student participation in learning.
– The instructor [C$FN] [C$LN] effectively made use of the online environment to support classroom learning.
Urban Education
– This course has improved my preparation to be a teacher in urban schools
Winter Session
– Given my experience in this winter session course, I would enroll in another
– The learning experience in this winter session course was equivalent to a course given during the regular academic year
– The average time spent studying outside of class each day was, in hours